The Unbelievable Excuse for Failing to Register a Contract: A Case Study in Oversight and Responsibility
In the world of procurement and contract management, adherence to proper processes is crucial to ensure transparency, compliance, and fiscal responsibility. Recently, I encountered a situation that underscores just how important this diligence is—and also highlights some of the more surprising excuses organizations might come up with when accountability is questioned.
Context of the Situation
While assisting a European organization in identifying potential cost-saving opportunities, we undertook a review of their payment records and contract register. Our goal was to identify any gaps in contract coverage and uncover areas where efficiencies could be realized. During this review, one particular supplier of lighting equipment stood out: despite providing services and products consistent with previous orders, they were absent from the organization’s contractual documentation.
The Explanation and Its Flaws
Curious about this discrepancy, I addressed the organization’s management about the missing contract. The response I received was startling in its simplicity: the manager claimed, “That’s my brother’s company, so I didn’t want to register the contract.”
While familial relationships can sometimes lead to informal agreements or challenges in administrative compliance, such a blatant excuse raises serious concerns about governance and procedural adherence. It appeared to be an attempt to justify bypassing standard procurement processes based on personal connections rather than legitimate business considerations.
The Investigation Unfolds
Prompted by the manager’s statement, we conducted a quick online investigation. Within just half an hour, we uncovered a significant amount of evidence linking the supplier to the manager’s family. We found his eBay account, where he was actively selling lighting equipment—items that closely matched the supplier’s product catalog, with transactions aligning with the organization’s previous invoices and purchase history.
This discovery not only undermined the initial excuse but also pointed toward potential non-compliance with procurement policies, possibly even illegal activity, which could warrant law enforcement involvement.
Reflections on Accountability and Oversight
This incident highlights the dangers of lax contract management and the importance of diligent oversight. Organizations must maintain comprehensive, accurate contract registers and enforce policies that prevent avoidance of formal procurement procedures—especially when personal relations are involved.
Furthermore, it underscores the need for vigilance and due diligence when reviewing supplier relationships and transactions. No matter how straightforward an explanation may seem, verifying the facts through proper channels can prevent significant compliance issues down the line.
Final Thoughts
The lesson here is clear: excuses that attempt to justify bypassing
Leave a Reply