Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Procurement: A Realistic Perspective on Supplier Discovery
In the rapidly evolving landscape of procurement technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) often promises a transformative impact—speeding up processes, uncovering hidden suppliers, and streamlining supplier evaluation. As someone new to AI and procurement, I’ve embarked on a journey to understand these claims firsthand by engaging with GPT, aiming to cut through the hype and understand what’s truly feasible. This article begins a series exploring AI’s role in different facets of procurement, starting with supplier discovery.
The Promises of AI in Supplier Discovery
Many procurement solutions tout the capabilities of AI in sourcing activities:
- Identifying Qualified Suppliers: AI can scour vast global databases, matching specifications, industry tags, or past spend data to pinpoint potential suppliers.
- Assessing and Ranking Suppliers: It can evaluate suppliers based on risk profiles, ESG compliance, diversity metrics, financial health, or delivery performance.
- Drafting Outreach Content: Generative AI is billed as capable of preparing RFIs or outreach emails to engage potential suppliers.
- Autonomous Sourcing: Some vendors claim AI can independently source, invite, and evaluate suppliers without human intervention.
At face value, these features sound impressive and transformative.
The Reality Check
Despite the alluring promises, the actual performance of AI tools in supplier discovery often falls short of expectations. Here’s a grounded look at what AI can and cannot do in this space:
Data Dependence
Most AI-driven procurement tools rely heavily on existing data coverage. If a supplier isn’t listed in the platform’s network or data sources, the AI won’t identify them—even if they’re the ideal fit. This limitation underscores the importance of comprehensive and up-to-date supplier databases.
Surface-Level Matching
AI algorithms typically match based on keywords, product categories, or standardized codes like UNSPSC. They lack the nuanced understanding needed to evaluate niche or specialized requirements, making their recommendations somewhat generic.
Backward-Looking Scoring
Supplier scoring models often analyze historical risk feeds or past performance data. These scores may not accurately reflect a supplier’s current capabilities or suitability for your specific needs.
Template-Driven Outreach
Automated communication can save time but often lacks the personalization and relationship-building qualities essential for trust and long-term collaboration.
In essence, while AI can effectively narrow down a large universe of suppliers, it doesn’t inherently know which ones are truly worth engaging with
Leave a Reply